Sunday, December 22, 2019

The Crucible Research Paper West Memphis Three - 1480 Words

Crucible Research Paper : West Memphis Three The West Memphis Three terminology was birthed when three troubled, teenage boys were accused of brutally torturing and murdering three young, innocent boys in West Memphis, Arkansas, in May of 1993. Authorities had mounting pressure to find the culprits responsible for the unspeakable crime. In a very short time, the three teens were accused, arrested and then charged with the brutal crime. It was not Salem, Massachusetts, but a witch-hunt was going on in West Memphis. It was almost three hundred years later, but three teenagers had to feel like they were being treated like witches that had to be put away. Chris Byers, Michael Moore, and Stevie Branch were the three innocent eight year old boys who were on a bike ride adventure on May 5, 1993 and never returned home again. Family, friends and the entire community were mortified beyond belief. It was unspeakable what happened to the boys. Chris, Michael, and Stevie were found in Robin Hood Hills naked, bound and mutilated. Immediately, rumors began that due to the brutal nature of the crime, it had to be that of satanic doing. On the flip side of the above innocent youngs boys, there are the three very troubled teens that live in the same town. Damien Echols, Jessie Misskelley, and Jason Baldwin. They were three well known teenagers in West Memphis Arkansas. The three teens had definitely made a name for themselves in their home town. There were rumors of

Friday, December 13, 2019

Case Brief Free Essays

Membreno, the plaintiff in this case hailed from Honduras. He entered into a work contract with the company Costa Crociere SPA or Costa, the defendant. He worked as an oiler on the ship on a contract with Cruise Ships Catering Service International, N. We will write a custom essay sample on Case Brief or any similar topic only for you Order Now V., (CSCS), a Netherlands Antilles company. The on – land office of the company was in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles. Costa is an Italian corporation whose headquarters are in Genoa, Italy. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Carnival Corporation, Panama, whose business is in Miami, Florida. It had no offices and staff in the United States. The plaintiff Membreno was on a brief work contract with CSCS to work on the ship Costa Atlantica. During the cruise, Membreno received a severe injury to his wrist while performing his duties. At that time the ship was on high seas in international waters and was sailing under the Italian flag. The Plaintiff reported to the on duty supervisor and ship’s doctor with regard to his injury. However, no medical treatment was offered to the plaintiff. Upon the completion of his contract, Membreno disembarked from the ship and went to Honduras where a surgeon diagnosed his wrist with Kinnock’s disease and recommended surgical treatment. Membreno sought and obtained a second opinion from a Miami orthopedic surgeon who performed surgery on the plaintiff’s wrist. In addition, the plaintiff also underwent physical therapy. Procedural History: Subsequently Membreno filed a petition in the district court on the basis of the Jones Act and general maritime law and claimed compensation for his injury. The defendants Costa and CSCS resorted to the doctrine of forum non conveniens to have the petition dismissed. The district court   taking into consideration   this doctrine dismissed the case. After this Membreno filed an appeal petition in the Eleventh Circuit Court. Issues legal question: The issues to be addressed in this case were : first, whether a suit can be filed in the   US courts   in respect of a cause of action that had arisen in a place that was external to its territorial waters , secondly, whether the Jones Act and the General Maritime Laws could be applied in this particular case. Thirdly, whether a claim could be dismissed on the grounds of forum non conveniens. Broad holding: The Jones Act and the General Maritime Laws will be applicable if the cause of action arises within the Territorial waters of the US. A claim cannot be made at a place where a subsidiary company is situated. Narrow holding: The court rejected the contention of the plaintiff stating that the injury had been inflicted on the High Seas. The company in Florida was a subsidiary to the main company. Doctrinal Reasoning: In Szumlicz v. Norwegian Am. Line, Inc. it was held that   the a claim should be dismissed on the grounds of   forum non conveniens in cases where  Ã‚   the United States law was   not applicable (Szumlicz v Norwegian Am.Line, Inc, 1983).The Supreme Court framed eight conditions in Lauritzen v. Larsen, which should be taken into consideration . They are: the place of the unlawful act, the national flag of the vessel, the residence of the injured party, the ship owner’s residential location, the place of the contract, the accessibility of a foreign court, the law of the court, and finally, the place of business of the ship owner. Six conditions out of these were not fulfilled, hence the defendant plead that US law was not applicable to the plaintiff. The important contention as to whether the defendant had been conducting his main business from the United States was proved in the negative (Lauritzen v. Larsen, 1953 ). Policy Reasoning: The Eleventh Circuit Court upheld the decision of the district court. Miscellaneous: There were no dissenting opinions as the judgement was unanimous. References Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 (1953 ). Szumlicz v Norwegian Am.Line, Inc, 698F.2d 1192 (11th Circuit Court 1983).                         How to cite Case Brief, Essay examples

Thursday, December 5, 2019

Understanding Of World Literature Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Understanding Of World Literature. Answer: World literature in its most simple sense is the sum total of all kinds of literature that prevails in the world in various cultures and countries. The exchange of literary knowledge between the countries and the appreciation of the same is the essence of world literature. However to define the world literature in a particular way of expression is almost impossible as the characteristic features are extremely varied and the extent of the literary works are limitless. Important is Goethes remark National literature is now a rather unmeaning term; the epoch of world literature is at hand, and everyone must strive to hasten its approach in understanding the purview of the literature in an international arena and how globalization in literature is paving way for further exchange of literary culture. Marx on the other hand in 1847 stated National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures there arises a world literature which may in a way be termed as the Marxists definition of world literature (Prawer, 2014). Fritz Stritch has endeavored in explaining world literature as traffic in ideas between peoples, a literary market to which the nations bring their intellectual treasures for exchange. All these potential descriptions have however not served the purpose of producing an all pervasive and comprehensive definition of world literature. Tartuffe is a play composed by Moliere in 1664. This can be successfully termed as a world literature because the term Tartuffe itself started to be used in the meaning hypocrite in English language (Molire, 2015). Antigone on the other hand was composed long ago in around 440 BC. This work cannot be truly be described as world literature as it mainly centers around the legends and myths of Thebes. However various themes included in the literature goes with todays various issues like civil disobedience, legal institutions, and family bonds. The Stranger by Albert Camus on the other hand perfectly represents the features of world literature, because the title character Meursault is described as "a citizen of France domiciled inNorth Africa, a man of theMediterranean, anhomme du midiyet one who hardly partakes of the traditional Mediterranean culture (Camus, 1993), what can be a better example of world literature which makes the reader go through so many cultures and ideas through one character. Leo Tolstoy completed the work Hadji Murat in his last days. This work eloquently depicts a classic east vs. west theme while depicting the struggle between Russia which was dominantly Christian and Chechnya which was dominantly Muslim. This work sincerely reflects the essence of the term world literature. The main difference between world literature and global literature lies in the fact that global literature is composed keeping in mind the world audience hence the themes are those to which the world readers can connect, on the other hand world literature was not composed keeping in mind the global nature of the readers, but the quality of the work and its themes made the world appreciate it. In conclusion it can be said that though there was and there are endeavors in defining the term world literature but it has not been possible yet. The extent of literature is so vast throughout the world that such possibilities are probably not to be materialized any time soon. Reference: Camus, A. (1993). The Stranger. 1942.Trans. Matthew Ward. New York: Knopf. Molire, J. B. P. (2015).Tartuffe. Oberon Books. Prawer, S. S. (2014).Karl Marx and world literature. Verso Books.